Next: 4.5 APD gain optimization
Up: 4 Numerical Capacity Results
Previous: 4.3 Data rate vs.
Fig. 7 begs the question of what PPM order optimizes the data
rate. For nighttime reception in which
, the optimal
PPM order is near
. This closely follows the discussion in
Section 2.2.2 regarding the errorless channel. For daytime
reception in which
, we can see from
Fig. 7 that the optimal PPM order is under 256. To be more
precise, the order of PPM that maximizes capacity in bits per second can
be seen directly from a plot of capacity versus
. This is shown in
Fig. 8, and the optimal PPM orders for various values of
are summarized in Table 3.
Figure 8:
Capacity of
-PPM on
an optical channel, with
,
,
,
ns,
ns,
and the SLiK APD detector.
![\includegraphics[width=5in]{figures/m.eps}](img183.gif) |
Table 3:
Optimal PPM orders
when
,
,
,
ns,
ns, and the SLiK APD detector.
 |
Optimal  |
| 0.1 |
2036 |
| 1 |
1815 |
| 10 |
634 |
| 50 |
52 |
| 100 |
18 |
This suggests use of a multiple PPM order communications system. During
nighttime reception it should use
on the order of thousands, and
during daytime reception it should use
on the order of dozens.
Unoptimized PPM orders can be costly. As can be seen from
Fig. 8, using
during the day would be disastrous for
the data rate. Using
at night reduces capacity by over half.
Next: 4.5 APD gain optimization
Up: 4 Numerical Capacity Results
Previous: 4.3 Data rate vs.
Jon Hamkins
1999-10-06